Man's Part and The Law's Part
in Sanctification

By Dennis McCallum and Gary DeLashmutt


Dennis McCallum's latest book "Satan and His Kingdom"

Christian leaders should develop a crystal clear theology of sanctification. This must include very definite convictions about the following questions: What is man's part in sanctification? What is God's part? What is the Law's part? This paper deals with the first and third questions. The second has to do with the ministries of the Holy Spirit, and our position in Christ. These will be covered elsewhere.


Man's Part in Sanctification

The Bible teaches that there is a continuity between sanctification and justification (Col. 2:6; Gal. 3:3)--both are by grace through faith. Specifically, man's part in sanctification consists of three distinct responsibilities. All three should be carefully defined, understood, and taught regularly, along with God's part. Each area can be summed up by one key word for memory purposes.


The Role of the Law in Sanctification

The following passages will also demonstrate the role of the law in sanctification. We see two basic roles that the law plays.

  1. The law has a negative role similar to the role that it plays in justification. That is the role of convincing the believer of the hopelessness of his sin nature, and of his need for the outside power of God. This is the Romans 7, or "law school" concept. This use of the law is not well understood by those who have been taught in the institutional church.
  2. The Old Testament law does not apply to the Christian except where it illustrates the character of God, and as such is always binding on the whole universe. Therefore, there is a certain validity to the "moral law" distinction in the Mosaic code. Another important distinction is that between Old Testament moral principles and case law. It is the moral principles that still apply, not the case laws.

    Even with the moral principles, it is important to realize that they are not approached in the Old Testament way as something that we attempt to perform by our own power (see Heb. 8:8-13). There is a difference between this legal approach to the law and the approach that recognizes our own impotence to perform it. Viewed in this way, moral imperatives serve to give content to our "seeking" (see above), whether they are from the Old or New Testament. It isn't enough to say in general, "I want to be sanctified." God presents us with area after area and waits for specific volitional action on our part. This action may take the form, for instance, of praying that God will effect the prescribed changes. Another necessary act of the will may be to a step of faith in the direction indicated. God may call on us to replace old patterns of living, by being available to have our needs for stimulation, security, love, purpose and joy filled in healthy ways.
  3. Reformed theologians generally recognize the "third use of the law" which states that the Christian is "under the law as a rule of faith and conduct." As stated in #2, we think this formulation is misleading and uninformative. It creates the impression that the Christian is under the moral law in the same way that the Old Testament believers were. It also argues that the law is a means of growth, which is contrary to New Testament teaching (Rom. 6:14; 7:4,6,10; II Cor 3:5,6; Heb 7:18,19).

Return to the Outlines page

Return to the Xenos home page

Ask Dennis a question or share a comment.

Ask Gary a question or share a comment.