Tpixel.gif (807 bytes)
crdsani2.gif (10183 bytes)

x
Xenos Christian
Fellowship
Crossroads Home
Xenos
Online Journal...

index
issue 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Xenos Summer
Institute

The Death of Truth

chapter 1
study guide
reviews

Meet the Director
Speaker's Bureau
Apologetics &
Evangelism
Resources
Postmodernism &
You
Conversation &
Cuisine


Chapter 6
Postmodern Impact:
Literature

Discussion Guide for Literature

Review the chart on p. 87. Focus on the section under the heading "grammatical-historical approach."

  • Think about the Bible as a text. What are the main questions we ask of a biblical passage to get at its meaning.
  • Why do we approach the Bible this way? Isn't it because we think that if we ask questions about the author, audience and the context of a passage, we can discover the author's intent and therefore the true meaning of the text? But postmodernists step in at this point and say that we're operating from a faulty paradigm. They say our assumptions about author, text and reader are wrong. Again review the chart on p. 87. This time focus on the column under Let's explore this a bit further.
The Author
  • Why do postmodernists argue that the author doesn't stand over the text as an authority?
  • Do you think that postmodernists have some important insight when they say that the authors' writing reflects the biases, values and beliefs of their culture? What examples come to mind? How might this effect the way we view scripture?
The Text

One of the big problems many postmodernists have with texts is that they "privilege" certain values and ideas over others. Since values and truth claims are social constructs, texts that are "privileged" (accepted into the social and literary canon) perpetuate views that keep power for the dominant culture while marginalizing minority cultures.

  • Is this viewpoint familiar to you? Where have you come into contact with it? Do you think this outlook perpetuates cynicism? How so?
  • How might the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution be viewed in terms of privileging certain values that perpetuate power at the expense of minority cultures?
The Reader

One of the tools postmodernists use to wrestle authority out of the text and into the reader is "deconstruction." Deconstruction purges texts of socially constructed hierarchies, contradictions and identifies things excluded from the text.

  • Why is being "logocentric" such a concern for deconstruction? What does this mean?
  • How does using deconstruction allow the reader to be an authority over the text?
  • Postmodernists say that in the final analysis, no one has final authority over the text. Why is this? What is the consequence of this view?

Facilitator's Guide for Literature

Review the chart on p. ___. Focus on the section under the heading "grammatical-historical approach."

  • Think about the Bible as a text. What are the main questions we ask of a biblical passage to get at its meaning.

Consider questions like:

- Who is the author?

- Who was the original audience?

- What historical factors about the audience might be important in understanding the passage?

- What is the broader context of the passage being studied?

- What words or concepts in the passage relate to central biblical teachings

  • Why do we approach the Bible this way? Isn't it because we think that if we ask questions about the author, audience and the context of a passage, we can discover the author's intent and therefore the true meaning of the text? But postmodernists step in at this point and say that we're operating from a faulty paradigm. They say our assumptions about author, text and reader are wrong. Again review the chart on p. ___. This time focus on the column under Let's explore this a bit further.
The Author
  • Why do postmodernists argue that the author doesn't stand over the text as an authority?

- For the discussion leader: Because authors are merely an expression of the cultural context that shapes their thought, values and beliefs. So there is nothing original being stated in the text. The text is merely an expression of the author's social reality. And that reality may or may not be relevant to the reader.

  • Do you think that postmodernists have some important insight when they say that the authors' writing reflects the biases, values and beliefs of their culture? What examples come to mind? How might this effect the way we view scripture?
The Text

One of the big problems many postmodernists have with texts is that they "privilege" certain values and ideas over others. Since values and truth claims are social constructs, texts that are "privileged" (accepted into the social and literary canon) perpetuate views that keep power for the dominant culture while marginalizing minority cultures.

  • Is this viewpoint familiar to you? Where have you come into contact with it? Do you think this outlook perpetuates cynicism? How so?
  • How might the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution be viewed in terms of privileging certain values that perpetuate power at the expense of minority cultures?

- Property rights included ownership of human slaves. "One man, one vote," meant "One man, but not one woman."

- Rights under the constitution only applied to citizens, not to Native Americans.

- But at the extreme, see revisionist judges who feel we have to read the constitution as it would be understood today, not then. Under this premise they invent new meanings never considered by the framers.

The Reader

One of the tools postmodernists use to wrestle authority out of the text and into the reader is "deconstruction." Deconstruction purges texts of socially constructed hierarchies, contradictions and identifies things excluded from the text.

  • Why is being "logocentric" such a concern for deconstruction? What does this mean?

- People are logocentric when they believe there are controlling ideas that are objectively true. People who favor one point of view as the "right" one are said to be logocentric by postmodernists.

  • How does using deconstruction allow the reader to be an authority over the text?

- The reader discerns what antitheses were at work in the original writing. The reader determines what the author's real motives were, and why he believed as he did.

  • Postmodernists say that in the final analysis, no one has final authority over the text. Why is this? What is the consequence of this view?

- They claim that the individual only has authority over what the text means to him or her, not to what it might mean to others.

- Texts' meanings can change depending on the reader.


Read onto the next section of the study guide

Return to the Table of Contents page

Return to the Download Options page

Return to the Death of Truth page

Return to the Crossroads Project

Return to the Xenos home page

Send a comment to Dennis


Top Of Page


Xenos Online Journal | Xenos Summer Institute
The Death of Truth | Meet the Director | Speaker's Bureau
Apologetics & Evangelism | Postmodernism and You
Conversation & Cuisine

Crossroads Home | Xenos Christian Fellowship

Send problems or comments to webmaster@xenos.org

pixel.gif (807 bytes)
crdslgo1.gif (941 bytes)