Tpixel.gif (807 bytes)
crdsani2.gif (10183 bytes)

x
Xenos Christian
Fellowship
Crossroads Home
Xenos
Online Journal...

index
issue 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Xenos Summer
Institute

The Death of Truth

chapter 1
study guide
reviews

Meet the Director
Speaker's Bureau
Apologetics &
Evangelism
Resources
Postmodernism &
You
Conversation &
Cuisine


Chapter 10
The Postmodern Method:
Law

Discussion Guide

  • Did the Rodney King trials ever make you wonder whether justice is based on race?
  • Why do you think the majority of people in jails are African American?
  • Saalman points out that traditional legal theory argues for the "Rule of Law." Postmodernists claim that there is no such thing as the rule of law because all laws have to be interpreted and applied by people. How would you respond to this point?
  • Recent study shows that crack cocaine users are far more likely to be arrested than are users of regular cocaine. Many observers claim that this proves the law operates under racism. After all, most crack users are black and poor, while most users of regular cocaine are middle class whites. How would you respond to these findings?
  • Critical legal theorists claim that judges wear robes and use archaic language in order to gain wrongful legitimation. Why do you think they wear robes? Are such traditions sinister?
  • Saalman quotes Stanley Fish as saying, "Does might make right? In a sense the answer I might give is yes, since in the absence of a perspective independent of interpretation some interpretive perspective will always rule by virtue of having won out over its competitors." If this is true, what can minorities expect in the future? What could hold out hope for minorities?

Facilitator's Manual for Law

  • Did the Rodney King trials ever make you wonder whether justice is based on race?
  • Why do you think the majority of people in jails are African American?
  • Saalman points out that traditional legal theory argues for the "Rule of Law." Postmodernists claim that there is no such thing as the rule of law because all laws have to be interpreted and applied by people. How would you respond to this point?

- Courts serve as checks and balances for each other to an extent, through the appeals system.

- It is certainly possible that laws could be interpreted unfairly. Many evangelicals believe this occurred in the case of Rowe vs. Wade. However, even though laws can be abused, a system without laws would be even worse.

  • Recent study shows that crack cocaine users are far more likely to be arrested than are users of regular cocaine. Many observers claim that this proves the law operates under racism. After all, most crack users are black and poor, while most users of regular cocaine are middle class whites. How would you respond to these findings?

- Racism is certainly one good possible explanation

- - Racism is one very good possible explanation

- Because crack is a cheaper high, it is associated with poor people, and poverty in turn has long been associated with crime. Since more African Americans are poor, it is not surprising that they more often are arrested in conjunction with other crimes, and are found to be in possession of crack.

- Wealthier white cocaine users are better able to hide their activities from police than the poor. Crack abuse remains a street crime, more liable to discovery. Note: Even if these last two explanations are correct, racism may be a factor in why proportionately more blacks are poor.

  • Critical legal theorists claim that judges wear robes and use archaic language in order to gain wrongful legitimation. Why do you think they wear robes? Are such traditions sinister?
  • Saalman quotes Stanley Fish as saying, "Does might make right? In a sense the answer I might give is yes, since in the absence of a perspective independent of interpretation some interpretive perspective will always rule by virtue of having won out over its competitors." If this is true, what can minorities expect in the future? What could hold out hope for minorities?

- Majority culture can always "win out" against other viewpoints if all is purely a matter of power, as Fish claims. Minorities should resist this sort of thinking with all their might.

- Only objective universally binding ethical values will guarantee fairness for minorities, and this is the very thing postmodernism denies. Many authorities, like Gene Veith, have worried that postmodernism could lead to fascism.


Read onto the next section of the study guide

Return to the Table of Contents page

Return to the Download Options page

Send a comment to Dennis

Return to the Death of Truth page

Return to the Crossroads Project

Return to the Xenos home page


Top Of Page


Xenos Online Journal | Xenos Summer Institute
The Death of Truth | Meet the Director | Speaker's Bureau
Apologetics & Evangelism | Postmodernism and You
Conversation & Cuisine

Crossroads Home | Xenos Christian Fellowship

Send problems or comments to webmaster@xenos.org

pixel.gif (807 bytes)
crdslgo1.gif (941 bytes)