peer feedback

Teacher:    Date:    Passage: 

INTRODUCTION (concise?  interesting?  pertinent?):

INTERPRETATION (accurate?  main theological point of passage?  included historical context if necessary?):

THOUGHT DEVELOPMENT (easy to follow?  no extraneous material?  good content per minute?):

APPLICATION/GOSPEL (sufficient application?  seeker-sensitive?  gospel not required):

ILLUSTRATION/EXAMPLE (relevant to their audience?  linked to the theological point?):

ANTITHESIS (relevant to audience & culture?):

DELIVERY/CONVICTION (sufficient heat?  eye-contact & gestures?  not note-dependent?  variation in volume, pace, etc.?  no Christianese or undefined terms?):

DISCUSSION QUESTION(S) (helpful?  conducive to interaction?):

OVERALL IMPRESSION & OTHER COMMENTS